Inclusion Bases and Peer Support: Building Belonging for Every Child

Liz Robson-Kelly portrait

Written by Liz Robson-Kelly

Educator, Positive and Organisational Psychologist, leading expert on Positive Education in the UK.

Inclusion bases give pupils who experience barriers to learning access to targeted support without losing their place in the wider school community. Yet many leaders find that specialist provision is only half the story. Whether it works depends just as much on the culture around it – a culture built on belonging.

Why Pupil Voice Matters

Inclusion is not something you do to pupils. It is something you build with them.

Pupils know where they feel safe and where they do not. They know which corridors feel overwhelming, which transitions cause anxiety, and which spaces feel welcoming. When you ask and genuinely listen, you learn about the real barriers to learning rather than the ones adults assume exist.

The Department for Education’s guidance on inclusion bases reinforces this, listing child, young person, and parent and carer voice among the quality-assurance sources a base should draw on each year. Pupil voice is not a nice extra. It is expected practice.

Crucially, pupil voice does not replace specialist teaching, therapeutic input, or SENCo oversight. It strengthens the whole-school culture that surrounds your specialist provision. Think of it as the soil, not the plant.

How Peer-Led Programmes Build Belonging

At Worth-it, we believe that belonging is one of the most powerful protective factors for young people’s mental health. Our programmes are rooted in positive psychology and designed to nurture a deep sense of school belonging that shapes identity, safety, and long-term wellbeing. When young people truly feel they belong, engagement, attendance, and positive behaviour naturally follow.

Peer support helps by:

  • Reducing isolation and normalising conversations about wellbeing
  • Creating low-barrier routes into help
  • Modelling kindness and inclusion across year groups
  • Building confidence and leadership in the pupils who take part

This matters enormously for an inclusion base. The DfE guidance is explicit that schools must guard against making pupils who use the base feel less valued than their mainstream peers. A strong peer-led culture is one of the most powerful ways to prevent that.

Peer Support in Practice

At Rainey Endowed School in Northern Ireland, trained student ambassadors set up a lunchtime Wellbeing Club. Autistic and SEN pupils in particular benefited from a calm, consistent space during what can otherwise be an overwhelming part of the day.

Many of the 200 schools we have worked with have paired Year 7 forms with trained ambassadors, run reverse integration through shared clubs, and produced pupil-authored welcome packs for children joining a base. Most schools run sustainable peer-led programmes with just two trained staff and a cohort of motivated students.

Evidencing What Inspectors Look For

This work helps you evidence exactly what the DfE and Ofsted are looking for. Ofsted inspects the base as part of the whole school, examining whether pupils feel welcome, valued, and part of the community.

Keep simple records of your peer-led activity. Buddy pairings, drop-in numbers, and feedback sessions all count. A shared spreadsheet is enough to demonstrate impact rather than just describe it.

Start Small

An effective base needs specialist teaching and clear SENCo oversight at its core. But they cannot succeed in isolation. What makes a base thrive is the culture around it, and that culture is built through belonging.

The schools that do this well all started with something small. A lunchtime club. A buddy pairing. A group of trained students with a clear brief. You do not need to do everything at once. You just need to start.

Worth-it Positive Education has three practical next steps to help you move forward:


The rise of ‘Universal design for learning’ – Why every Further Education provider is talking about UDL

Sarah Vickrage portrait

Written by Sarah Vickrage

Sarah Vickrage is a Teaching and Inclusion Specialist at the Fellowship of Inspection Nominees, supporting Further Education providers to embed meaningful inclusive practice.

For years, Universal Design for Learning (UDL) has often been viewed as something “nice to have” or an approach championed by SEND specialists. Today, that is changing. Across the further education sector, UDL is moving from the margins into the mainstream as a practical framework for improving teaching quality, supporting inclusion and helping every learner achieve.

Growing interest in UDL also aligns with the direction of travel set out in the Department for Education’s proposed SEND reforms under Universal Support. While the reforms cover the whole education system, they place a strong emphasis on creating a more inclusive mainstream experience, improving consistency of support and reducing barriers to participation. For further education providers, this reinforces a shift away from relying solely on individual interventions and towards designing learning environments that are accessible from the outset, with the assumption that learner variability is entirely normal. UDL provides a practical framework for achieving this: embedding inclusive practice into everyday teaching while continuing to offer targeted support where it is needed most. 

Individual reasonable adjustments remain an essential part of high-quality education provision. However, they often rely on diagnosis, disclosure or referral and can also unintentionally create delays or reinforce the idea that some learners are exceptions to the norm. 

Why now?

Several factors are bringing UDL into sharper focus across FE. Firstly, colleges are seeing increasingly diverse learner cohorts. We are still seeing the children of the Covid-19 pandemic move into the workplace, and while the pandemic did not create the need for UDL, it highlighted many issues UDL seeks to address. Alongside growing awareness of neurodiversity, there is greater recognition of differences in language, literacy, mental health, disability, prior educational experiences and life circumstances.

Secondly, inclusion is increasingly recognised as an organisational responsibility rather than solely the responsibility of learning support teams. It needs to be embedded into every decision, strategy and policy. 

Finally, expectations around quality teaching continue to evolve. Inclusive practice is no longer viewed as an optional enhancement but as a hallmark of effective teaching and learning. For many providers, UDL offers a practical way of bringing these priorities together.

What does UDL look like in practice?

One of the biggest misconceptions is that UDL requires teachers to produce multiple versions of every lesson. When I think back to my first years in teaching where we were expected to make 3 versions of the same worksheet and know exactly who would be working on each sheet before the start of the lesson it makes my toes curl. 

Most UDL strategies are simple changes that improve learning for everyone. Many educators are already using these approaches. UDL simply provides a framework for making them intentional and consistent.

Good for everyone, not just some

One of the strengths of UDL is that it avoids creating a divide between “supported learners” and everyone else. 

For example, when a learner with ADHD frequently asks for instructions to be repeated, they can be viewed as needing extra support. However, providing instructions verbally, visually and in written form benefits everyone, including learners with anxiety, language differences or those balancing education with other responsibilities.

Clear visual organisation may support an autistic learner, while also reducing cognitive load for someone learning in a second language. Captions on videos help learners with hearing impairments, but they are equally valuable in noisy environments or for learners revising independently.

A strategic opportunity for FE

As providers continue to strengthen their approach to inclusion, UDL offers more than a collection of teaching strategies. It provides a common language that can connect curriculum design, staff development, learner support and quality improvement, ensuring we are all on the same page with the same high standards. 

For providers looking to reflect on their current practice, the Fellowship of Inspection Nominees’ inclusion resources provide a useful framework for exploring how effectively inclusion is embedded across the organisation, from leadership decisions through to classroom practice.

Looking ahead

Universal Design for Learning is unlikely to remain a specialist concept for much longer. As FE providers continue to reflect on curriculum quality, teaching and learner experience, UDL provides an opportunity to move beyond asking whether individual learners are being supported and towards asking whether the learning environment itself is designed to enable success.

The most inclusive providers will be those that see accessibility not as something added when a need is identified, but as a fundamental part of high-quality education.

The conversation about UDL has started. The opportunity now is to move from discussion to action, embedding inclusive design into everyday practice so every learner has the opportunity to participate, progress and achieve. 

Ask yourself, are you designing education around the barriers the learners face, or are you designing education that removed those barriers in the first place?


What Do I Say Right Now?

Orla McKeating portrait

Written by Orla McKeating

Entrepreneur, coach and motivational speaker

“My parents told me to cross the road when I see a Black or Brown man.” “Can I say the word ‘Black’?” “I don’t think immigrants should come here.” “That’s gay.”

These are conversations I have heard over the last five years through my work with Still I Rise Voices. And increasingly, I hear another question underneath all of them:

“What do I say right now?”

Because our children are growing up in a world where conversations about race, migration, identity, gender, disability, culture and belonging are everywhere. They hear things at home. They see things online. They hear conversations in the playground. They absorb the language of adults around them. And sometimes they bring all of that into the classroom.

For teachers and educators, this can feel like a lot.

You are already carrying enormous responsibility. You are supporting children academically, emotionally and socially, often while navigating significant workload pressures.

The 2025 NASUWT Big Question Survey, which included more than 10,000 teachers across the UK, found that almost half of teachers – 48% – reported a substantial increase in workload over the previous year. Teachers reported working an average of 47 hours a week, including around 12 hours outside the school day. 

And in England, the picture is similarly difficult. Research commissioned by the Department for Education found that only 17% of teachers and leaders agreed that they had an acceptable workload in 2023.

So, when we talk about creating inclusive classrooms, we may need to acknowledge something important. Teachers cannot be expected to know everything. They cannot be expected to have all the language. All the answers. All the cultural knowledge. All the confidence. And all the time. That doesn’t mean these conversations aren’t important.

It means we need to give educators the tools and support to have them well. 

The Context is Changing

In Northern Ireland especially, the need for these conversations is not theoretical. Our classrooms are changing alongside our communities, and the wider environment children are growing up in matters.

The PSNI recorded 2,260 race-motivated incidents and 1,430 race-motivated crimes during 2025 – the highest 12-month level recorded since this data series began in 2004/05. 

The figures don’t tell us what every child is experiencing but they do tell us something about the environment around us.

And educators are often the adults who are expected to help children make sense of that environment. They may be the person a child turns to after hearing something racist. The person who notices that a child has stopped participating. The person who needs to challenge a stereotype without humiliating the child who repeated it. The person trying to support a child who feels different. The person wondering:

“Is this the right language?”

“Should I challenge this?”

“What if I make it worse?”

“What if a parent complains?”

“What if I don’t know enough?”

These questions don’t make you a bad educator. They make you human. We need to move away from fear

One of the things I have learned through working with more than 10,000 children and young people across Ireland and the UK is that the most powerful conversations don’t usually begin with having the perfect answer.

They begin with curiosity.

I have seen a Global Majority girl jump up when she recognised someone who looked like her in a book. Her whole face lit up. “She’s like me!”

I’ve seen a child proudly share parts of their culture with classmates after seeing a character wearing a hijab. I’ve heard teenagers express views about immigration that are uncomfortable to hear. I’ve heard children say, “That’s gay,” followed by laughter.

And these moments matter. Not because every child has suddenly become perfectly inclusive. But because we have an opportunity to pause. To ask:

Why do you think that?

Where did you hear that?

How might that make someone feel?

Is that actually true?

What could we say instead?

That is where learning happens. Not through shame. Not through humiliation. Not through pretending difficult things aren’t being said. But through conversation. Inclusion isn’t about having the perfect words.

I used to think change came through fighting. I fought hard for my mixed-race son and what he experienced in school. I fought against systems. I fought against language. 

But over time, I realised that there is another kind of work. The quieter work. The work of sitting together. Listening. Learning about our own biases. Understanding where someone is starting from. Having the conversation. Asking another question. Sharing another story. Changing one word. Opening one book. Helping one child feel seen. Because sometimes one moment can change how a child understands the world. And sometimes one moment can change how an adult understands a child.

So, What Do I Say Right Now?

That is exactly why I created “What Do I Say Right Now?”

It is a practical resource for teachers, educators, parents and anyone who wants to feel more confident navigating difficult conversations around inclusion.

Because sometimes we don’t need another lecture. We need somewhere to start. We need language. We need prompts. We need reassurance. We need to know that we are allowed to say: “I’m not sure, but let’s explore that together.”

There is something beautiful about correcting something without shaming a child. We can start to understand that having a conversation about race does not have to mean having the perfect vocabulary.

And we need somewhere to keep learning.

That is what I want to create through The Inclusion Lab – a hybrid learning platform and  trusted space for educators and people who care about creating more inclusive environments to keep learning, asking questions and building confidence.

Because inclusion isn’t a one-off training session. It isn’t a tick box. And it certainly isn’t about getting everything right all the time. It is a practice. A conversation.  A commitment. Little by little. Word by word. Story by story.

So, if you have ever found yourself thinking:

What do I say right now?

I’ve created something to help. Download your free copy of “What Do I Say Right Now?” and start with one conversation.

Because language changes things. Connection changes things. Stories change things. Voices change the world. Still We Rise.


Belonging Is Not Another Initiative. It Is an Outcome of How Your School Works

Dr Donna de Haan portrait

Written by Dr Donna de Haan

Dr Donna de Haan is a sociologist, qualitative researcher and Founder of The Diversity Doctor. She helps brave leaders make the invisible culture of their organisations visible by uncovering the patterns shaping people’s everyday experiences. Donna is the creator of The Living School Model™, which helps schools create the cultural conditions in which staff thrive and pupils flourish, and the author of the forthcoming book If These Walls Could Talk. Find out more at www.diversity-doctor.com.

Belonging is about to become another thing schools are expected to measure. And I can already see what could happen next.

  • A new survey.
  • A new initiative.
  • A new responsibility added to somebody’s already overflowing workload.

But belonging is not another piece of work to add to the school improvement plan.

Belonging is an outcome of how your school already works.

It is shaped by the interactions pupils have with the adults around them. By the way they are greeted in the morning. By what happens when they get something wrong. By whether expectations feel clear and consistent. By whether their contribution is noticed and whether they feel safe enough to ask for help, express who they are or say when something does not feel right. Pupils are experiencing the culture of their school every day. The question is whether we are paying attention to what that experience is telling us.

Lived experience is data

Schools already hold vast amounts of data about pupils: attendance, attainment, behaviour, exclusions and engagement. But much of this is lagging data. It tells us what has happened after a pupil has started to disengage, withdraw or struggle. It shows us the outcome, but it does not always reveal the everyday experiences that created it.

The lived experience of pupils and staff is the data being created in real time.

Belonging is present in the small interactions that happen long before a pattern appears on a dashboard. It is shaped through relationships, routines, decisions and responses that may seem insignificant in isolation but collectively teach people what they can expect from the school. That is why measuring belonging cannot begin and end with asking pupils whether they feel they belong. We also need to understand the culture producing their answer.

Pupils experience school through its adults

When we talk about pupil belonging, our attention naturally turns towards pupils. But pupils experience their school largely through their interactions with adults, and those adults are also having a lived experience of the same organisation.

Do staff feel valued and trusted? Do they experience clarity and consistency? Can they ask questions, contribute ideas or admit that they are struggling without fear of judgement? Do they feel part of the school community, or simply responsible for delivering within it?

This matters because adults do not create culture from outside it. They create it while experiencing it. A teacher who feels trusted, supported and able to contribute is working within very different cultural conditions from one who feels unheard, depleted or constantly scrutinised. Those conditions travel. They influence the tone of classrooms, the quality of relationships and the emotional experience pupils have throughout the school day. This does not mean that pupil and staff experiences will always be the same. But they are not separate. If we want to understand whether pupils belong, we must also become curious about whether the adults responsible for creating that belonging experience it themselves.

Start by noticing what is already happening

The good news is that schools do not need to create belonging from nothing. It is already alive in many of the relationships, routines and practices taking place every day. There will also be moments when it becomes inconsistent, conditional or harder for some people to access.

The work is to notice both.

Before launching something new, look at how your school currently works. Where are people already experiencing trust, connection and contribution? Where are they having to work harder to feel included? What are pupils and staff learning about what happens when they speak, struggle, challenge or need something different? That is where the real story of belonging begins.

I have created a free resource, How to Build and Measure Belonging Without Adding Another Initiative, exploring the five questions school leaders are asking following the White Paper—and the answers many schools may be missing.

If you would like ongoing support to look at your school through a different lens, you can also join the Living School Leadership Community. Each week, I share one idea and one practical invitation to help school and trust leaders notice the culture they are already creating and decide where their attention will have the greatest impact. Members can also join live Listening Circles to explore these questions alongside other leaders, without judgement and without pretending to have everything figured out.

Because belonging will not be created by the initiative we launch next. It is being created by the way our schools work today.


What start of term rituals and routines can educators create in our classrooms to centre student belonging?

Hannah Wilson portrait

Written by Hannah Wilson

Founder and Director of the Belonging Effect (formerly Diverse Educators).

Belonging is what students feel. Mattering is what students believe about their value to others.

A student can feel accepted but still wonder whether anyone would notice if they were absent. 

True inclusion is when students know:

  • I am welcome here.
  • I am known here.
  • I am valued here.
  • I contribute here.
  • I make a difference here.

So as we plan to set up our new classrooms and meet our new students at the start of a new academic year, what should we be intentionally planning and consciously considering to ensure that we centre belonging and mattering at the heart of our learning environments? 

Theme 1: Look from the outside in

The most powerful question educators can ask at the start of the academic year is not “What do I want my classroom to be?” but “What does it feel like to be a student walking into this classroom for the very first time?”

Belonging begins with perspective-taking. For some learners, the first day is exciting. For others, it is filled with uncertainty, anxiety or the question, “Will I fit in here?” Looking from the outside in encourages educators to notice the small moments that communicate whether students are welcome, valued and safe before a single lesson begins.

Theme 2: Safety creates the conditions for growth

Students bring with them the seeds of who they are – their strengths, hopes, identities and experiences. The role of the school is to cultivate those seeds.

This means creating an environment where students feel physically, psychologically and emotionally safe. It is about setting clear expectations alongside compassionate relationships. Like a safety net beneath a tightrope, boundaries do not restrict students; they give them the confidence to explore, take risks, make mistakes and discover who they are becoming.

When students know they will be supported if they stumble, they are far more willing to participate, lead, question and learn.

Theme 3: Belonging grows through contribution

Belonging is not something educators simply give to students. It develops when students have meaningful opportunities to shape their community.

Leadership roles, student voice, peer mentoring, classroom responsibilities and collaborative decision-making all communicate a powerful message:

“You are not just part of this school – you help make this school what it is.”

Feeling heard is just as important as being listened to.

Theme 4: Students need to see themselves

Creating belonging is also about what students encounter every day through the curriculum.

The books on the shelves, the scientists, authors and historians studied, the case studies, examples, photographs and research all send messages about who matters.

When diversity is woven naturally throughout learning – not reserved for awareness days or special events – it communicates that different ethnicities, religions, family structures, genders, abilities and lived experiences are an ordinary and valued part of society.

Representation tells students: “People like me belong here too.”

Theme 5: Know the learner behind the learner

Relationships remain the foundation of belonging.

Learn names and pronounce them correctly. Show genuine curiosity about students beyond their attainment or behaviour. Ask about their interests, aspirations, cultures and lived experiences – and keep asking.

Students quickly recognise the difference between being known and simply being managed.

When educators remain interested throughout the year, they communicate one of the strongest messages of mattering:

“I see you, and you matter to me.”

Theme 6: Build belonging together

One practical way to establish this culture from day one is to create a class agreement or class contract collaboratively.

Rather than presenting a list of rules, invite students to explore questions such as:

  • How do we want everyone to feel in this classroom?
  • What helps us learn best?
  • What behaviours create belonging?
  • How will we respond when mistakes happen?
  • What responsibilities do we all share?

Co-creating expectations fosters ownership, accountability and mutual respect from the outset.

Final Thoughts

Perhaps the greatest gift educators can give at the beginning of the academic year is not a perfectly organised classroom or an engaging first lesson – it is the certainty that every student belongs and matters.

Belonging does not happen by chance. Mattering is not left to luck. They are cultivated through thousands of intentional moments: a smile at the classroom door, a correctly pronounced name, a curriculum that reflects the richness of our communities, an invitation to contribute, a conversation that says: “Tell me about you.”

Students flourish in environments where they feel safe enough to be themselves, valued enough to contribute, and supported enough to grow. Every interaction, every curriculum choice, every relationship and every opportunity for student voice helps create that culture.

The question is not simply: “Do our students belong?”

The more important question is: “What are we intentionally doing every day to ensure every student knows they belong – and that they matter?”

Recommended Reading:

If you would like to explore the evidence behind belonging and mattering in greater depth, these are two excellent places to start:


How Inclusive Is Your Workplace?

Hannah Wilson portrait

Written by Hannah Wilson

Founder and Director of the Belonging Effect (formerly Diverse Educators).

When we hear the word inclusion, many of us think about policies, legislation or equality training. While these are important, true inclusion is something much simpler – and much more powerful.

It is about how people experience your workplace every single day.

Do they feel welcome? Are they listened to? Can they contribute without fear of judgement? Do they believe they belong?

These questions matter because inclusion is not simply about meeting legal obligations; it is about creating an environment where people can perform at their best.

Research consistently shows that inclusive workplaces benefit from greater engagement, stronger collaboration, improved innovation and better staff retention. When people feel respected and valued, they are more likely to share ideas, solve problems and contribute positively to organisational success.

Yet inclusion is not achieved through good intentions alone.

Often, the greatest barriers are not deliberate acts of discrimination but everyday habits, assumptions and systems that unintentionally exclude people.

Think about your own workplace:

  • Who speaks most during meetings?
  • Are different communication styles welcomed?
  • Does everyone have equal opportunities to develop and progress?
  • Are recruitment processes truly inclusive?
  • Do policies reflect the diverse needs of today’s workforce?
  • Does everyone feel comfortable raising concerns or challenging ideas?

These questions encourage us to look beyond compliance and consider workplace culture.

One of the most valuable concepts we explore during training is that diversity and inclusion are not the same thing.

Diversity is about who is present…

Inclusion is about what happens once people arrive…

A diverse workforce without an inclusive culture can still leave individuals feeling unheard, overlooked or excluded. Inclusion requires conscious effort from everyone, not just leaders or HR professionals.

It is also important to remember that diversity is not always visible.

Many colleagues may be managing invisible disabilities, neurodivergence, long-term health conditions, caring responsibilities, mental health challenges, cultural differences or other experiences that shape how they engage with work. Creating inclusive environments means recognising that one size rarely fits all.

Fortunately, inclusion doesn’t always require large-scale organisational change.

Often, it is the small actions that make the biggest difference:

Listening with curiosity…

Using inclusive language…

Making meetings accessible…

Being open to flexible ways of working…

Inviting quieter voices into conversations…

Questioning assumptions before making decisions…

Taking time to learn from different perspectives…

Perhaps the most powerful question we can ask is:

Who might this decision work well for – and who might it unintentionally disadvantage?

Whether we are recruiting, designing services, communicating with customers or leading teams, this simple question helps us make more thoughtful and inclusive decisions.

Importantly, creating an inclusive workplace is not about getting everything right all the time.

We all have biases. We all make assumptions. We all make mistakes.

An inclusive culture is one where people are willing to listen, learn, reflect and adapt.

It is about replacing certainty with curiosity and recognising that inclusion is an ongoing journey rather than a destination.

Every organisation, regardless of size or sector, has opportunities to become more inclusive.

The question is not whether your workplace is perfect. The real question is: How inclusive is your workplace – and what is one thing you could do differently tomorrow?


Supporting Religiously Diverse Staff to Feel Safe and Included in Teacher Training

Belonging Effect Favicon

Written by Belonging Effect

Belonging Effect is committed to shaping intention into impact and supporting people with their Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Belonging strategy and training needs.

As schools and teacher training providers continue to build more inclusive environments, conversations about supporting staff from diverse religious backgrounds are becoming increasingly important. While much attention is rightly given to supporting pupils, creating a culture where trainee teachers and school staff feel safe, respected and able to bring their whole selves to work is equally vital.

Recently, a teacher training provider approached us seeking advice on how best to support a trainee teacher who has chosen to wear a niqab. Their question was thoughtful and proactive: how can we ensure she feels welcomed and supported, particularly when there are currently no colleagues within our school communities who wear a niqab?

The answer begins with a simple but often overlooked principle: inclusion is not about making assumptions. It is about creating conditions where people can tell us what they need and trusting them as experts in their own experience.

Start with the Individual

Every person’s experience of faith and religious expression is different. While some women who wear a niqab may choose to remove it in certain professional settings, others may not. Some may require specific adjustments, while others may not need any additional support at all.

The most effective starting point is a respectful conversation with the trainee herself. Rather than focusing on what challenges might arise, ask open questions about what would help her feel comfortable, safe and supported throughout her training journey.

This approach not only avoids assumptions but also demonstrates trust, respect and partnership.

Focus on the Environment, Not Just the Individual

When organisations think about support, attention often centres on the individual who may be perceived as “different”. However, in many cases the greatest opportunity lies in preparing the wider environment.

Religious literacy and awareness training can help colleagues better understand different forms of religious dress and practice. This is not about requiring staff to become experts in every faith tradition. Rather, it is about building confidence, reducing misconceptions and creating a culture where curiosity is respectful and inclusion is everyone’s responsibility.

Small actions can have a significant impact:

  • Ensuring all staff engage with the trainee as they would any other colleague.
  • Addressing questions or misconceptions through education rather than leaving individuals to explain or defend their choices.
  • Encouraging respectful conversations about diversity and inclusion.
  • Challenging stereotypes when they arise.

These everyday behaviours often have a greater impact on belonging than any formal policy.

Consider Practical Adjustments

As with any member of staff, there may be practical considerations that support comfort and wellbeing.

Potential adjustments could include:

  • Access to well-ventilated spaces during warmer weather.
  • Private or discreet spaces if required for personal comfort.
  • Consideration of uniform or dress expectations where relevant.
  • Opportunities to discuss placement-specific considerations before entering a new school environment.

The key is flexibility and dialogue rather than assuming that particular adjustments will be required.

Representation Matters

Inclusion is reinforced when people can see themselves reflected in their environment.

Schools and training providers may wish to review resources, displays, library books and curriculum materials to ensure they reflect a diverse range of religious identities and experiences. For example, when discussing Muslim communities, representation can extend beyond images of the hijab to include the diversity of ways Muslim women choose to express their faith.

Visible representation helps communicate an important message: you belong here.

Preparing for Questions from Parents and Communities

Inclusion sometimes involves preparing for questions from the wider school community. While most interactions are likely to be positive, schools may occasionally receive enquiries from parents who are unfamiliar with certain forms of religious dress.

Having clear, values-based messaging prepared in advance can help staff respond confidently and consistently. Responses should focus on professional standards, equality, respect and the school’s commitment to creating an inclusive environment for both staff and pupils.

Importantly, the burden of responding to concerns should never fall on the trainee herself.

Cultivating a Culture of Belonging

Ultimately, supporting religiously diverse staff is not about creating special treatment. It is about ensuring that everyone has equal opportunity to thrive.

For teacher training providers, this means moving beyond compliance and towards genuine inclusion. It means recognising that diversity within the teaching workforce enriches schools, broadens perspectives and provides valuable role models for young people.

When organisations focus on listening, representation, religious literacy and everyday respect, they create environments where all trainees can flourish—not despite their identity, but with it fully recognised and valued.

The question is not simply how we support one trainee teacher. The question is how we build school communities where every member of staff feels they belong from the moment they walk through the door.

Final Thoughts

Creating inclusive workplaces requires more than good intentions. It requires curiosity, listening, and a willingness to examine the systems, cultures and assumptions that shape people’s experiences. By taking proactive steps to support religiously diverse staff, schools and training providers can help ensure every educator feels valued, respected and able to thrive. 

Call to Action

Please do get in touch if you have worked on an inclusive dress policy and would like to share best practice or if you have lived experience of wearing the niqab at work and would be willing to share your experiences.


Belonging in Schools: From Staff Culture to Pupil Experience

Belonging Effect Favicon

Written by Belonging Effect

Belonging Effect is committed to shaping intention into impact and supporting people with their Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Belonging strategy and training needs.

Creating a school where every individual feels they truly belong is one of the most transformative goals a leadership team can pursue. But what does “belonging” actually mean in practice, and how do we move past buzzwords to build genuine, inclusive communities? 

In a recent webinar hosted by Iona Kelliher, the Managing Director of Edurio and The Belonging Effect, experts Hannah Wilson and Zahara Chowdhury dug deep into these exact questions. Drawing from their extensive work with schools, they shared practical, actionable insights on how to transform school culture from the staffroom to the classroom. 

  1. Navigating the Biggest Challenges in School Belonging

When it comes to cultivating belonging, school leaders often face roadblocks on two fronts: workforce demographics and communication barriers. 

  • Workforce Diversification & Retention: Hannah says, recruiting, developing, and retaining a diverse cohort of staff, leaders, and governors remains a major challenge. To overcome this, schools must move toward active listening. Hannah Wilson emphasizes the need for regular feedback loops, structured listening activities, and thorough exit interviews. 
  • Courageous Conversations: Zahara points out that many educators struggle with having uncomfortable conversations and knowing exactly what to say (and when to say it) in both classrooms and staffrooms. 

The Solution: Overcoming these hurdles requires deep consistency. Schools must build a shared language, routine, and approach to belonging so that all students and staff feel secure within the school’s overarching identity – and their own individual identities within it. 

  1. Extending Belonging Beyond the School Gates

Schools do not exist in a vacuum; creating a sense of belonging for children means engaging with families and the wider local community. 

  • Meet Communities on Their Terms: Zahara advises school leaders to physically step into the community. Go to community strongholds, local environments, or even the supermarket to engage with families where they feel safe and on their terms. 
  • Co-Create Solutions: True collaboration means enabling what the community actually needs, rather than what school leaders think they need. 
  • Celebrate Diverse Identities: Highlighting local initiatives that champion diversity can bridge the gap between home and school. For instance, looking at local community projects – like Bristol’s Black Joy Trail – can provide beautiful blueprints for celebrating diverse identities and fostering joy. 
  1. First Steps to Take Right Now

If you want to immediately shift your school’s culture toward greater belonging, the experts recommend starting with these two tangible steps:

  • Implement a Shared DEIB Calendar: Build a shared Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Belonging (DEIB) calendar for all staff. Review your current assemblies and celebrations against it to see what might be missing, ensuring a healthy balance of focus across various awareness days, weeks, months, and religions. 
  • Just Ask (and Listen): Be explicit with your school community. Send a clear message stating that you want to ensure everyone feels included, and humbly acknowledge that you might not always get it right. Establish clear, transparent communication lines detailing how you will gather feedback, what you will do with it, and the timelines for action. Whenever possible, look for opportunities to co-create policy with your community, or experiment with frameworks like reverse mentoring. 
  1. Designing a Neuro-inclusive Environment

Many neurodivergent pupils find themselves “tolerating” or masking at school rather than genuinely thriving. Because the traditional school model is highly systemic, reasonable adaptations alone are often not enough. 

To address this, schools must look at neuro-inclusivity through a wider lens:

  • Consistency in Adjustments: Staff and pupil training on neurodiversity is essential. Any reasonable adjustments made for pupils must be clearly communicated and clarified across the board so that application is consistent. 
  • Shift from the Individual to the System: Instead of focusing purely on modifying the minoritised student, look at the environment, the people, and the student experience around them. Investigate what everyone needs to learn and do to adapt, with the goal of creating a classroom and community that is universal by design. 
  • Investigate the “Toleration”: Don’t be afraid to ask students and parents exactly what they are tolerating. Examine the nuances – from transition periods and email communications to clubs and curriculum materials. 
  1. The Danger of “Inclusion Bases”

Many schools utilise inclusion bases or separate spaces for specific pupils, but how does this impact a child’s sense of belonging? 

Hannah warns that we must critically examine whether our inclusion efforts are actually forms of hidden segregation or exclusion – such as placing students in a different building, room, or table. Leaders need to act as their own “critical friends” and ask hard, reflective questions: Why are these pupils in that base? Have they been excluded? Do they actually feel more included there? Addressing these systemic questions is incredibly powerful when embedded directly into a school’s strategic development plan. 

  1. Aligning Belonging with Inspection Frameworks (Ofsted)

Belonging is not just a pastoral nice-to-have; it sits squarely within modern inspection expectations. Under current inspection frameworks, Ofsted assesses belonging through the lenses of inclusion and personal development. Inspectors look past simply providing a “seat in the classroom” to evaluate several core areas: 

  • Curriculum Representation: Does what you teach reflect the diversity of your school’s community? Minority groups, pupils with SEND, and disadvantaged children should feel visible and respected in the curriculum. 
  • Relational Inclusion: Moving away from a strict reliance on rigid reward and sanction charts, inspectors look at how staff actively build trusting, emotionally safe relationships with pupils -particularly those struggling with behaviour or attendance. 
  • Pupil and Parent Voice: Evidence is gathered through surveys and discussions to check if learners truly feel they matter, have a voice, and are treated fairly. 
  • Safe Spaces for Dialogue: School leadership must demonstrate how they handle difficult conversations regarding discrimination and equality to foster peer-to-peer respect. 
  1. Measuring Progress and Overcoming Pushback

How can school leaders ensure that their belonging and anti-harm work is genuinely shifting staff behaviour and building pupil trust? 

  • Track the Data: Utilising weekly pulse surveys provides a quick, regular check-in on school climate. Interestingly, after robust training, schools often see a temporary spike in reported incidents. Do not panic – this is usually a positive sign of increased consciousness and staff confidence in noticing and naming harm. 
  • Gather Qualitative Insight: Set up dedicated email inboxes and compile staff case studies to capture the nuances of the student experience. Remember, a wealth of research confirms that belonging and inclusion directly correlate with improved student outcomes and academic progress. 

Navigating Community and Staff Pushback

When introducing topics like Pride or LGBT identities, leaders occasionally encounter friction from staff or students. While student voice is vital, areas that impact student safety and prevent harm cannot be ignored. 

To move past “complicit compliance” or a snail’s pace, look at pushback with genuine curiosity. Ask yourself: Why is there pushback? Is it due to a lack of inclusion literacy, media influence, high workloads, or a feeling that other areas are being ignored? Often, friction is projected when staff or students feel a lack of belonging and wellbeing themselves. Introducing intersectional role models (such as showcasing that someone can co-exist within multiple identities, like being both LGBT and Muslim) can humanise these conversations and bridge cultural divides. 

Looking to Deepen Your Practice?

Cultivating true belonging requires a continuous commitment to training, reflection, and structural change. For school leaders, governors, and trustees looking to further their development, The Belonging Effect offers a wealth of tailored toolkits, books, job boards, and specialised training frameworks – spanning inclusive recruitment, neurodiversity awareness, and governor DEIB oversight. 

If you missed Part 1 of the series you can catch up here: Edurio – Belonging in Schools: From Staff Culture to Pupil Experience 

Ready to take the next step in measuring culture across your school network? Stay tuned for Part 2 of the series: How to Measure Belonging in Your Trust on 6th July


Empowering Young People to Change the World

Nicola Wetherall portrait

Written by Nicola Wetherall

Nicola is an RE teacher by training, but a specialist and Lead Practitioner for Holocaust, genocide and human rights education at Royal Wootton Bassett Academy, she curates the Empowering Young People to Change the World teacher conference series. She combines her part time role at RWBA with her Associate Professor (Teaching) role at the UCL Centre for Holocaust Education, specialising in curriculum, pedagogy and school development by supporting the Quality Mark process and Beacon School alumni engagement. Nicola founded the Holocaust, their family, me and us schools project.

This year’s DEIB Showcase for #EYP2CtW26 session felt like an expansion – a widening of what we pay attention to in schools, and a reminder that belonging is not an optional extra but a foundation. 

We began with Hannah Wilson, who was joined by, and introduced us to, colleagues from the Belonging Effect (formerly Diverse Educators) network, who each brought a richness of experience, context and lived insight that was both energising and deeply grounding. But before I turn to each contribution in turn, I want to say a special thankyou to Hannah, an ally and leader who has supported #EYP2CtW26 conference for many years now, and once again curated a session for us today that was compelling, generous and full of practical wisdom.

So first we welcomed Yassar Hussain – from the UAE – who talked us through GEMS Metropole’s DEIB journey, referring to a range of scholarship that had informed that process, the importance of intentionality, student voice and agency. Yassar’s section was a powerful reminder that belonging doesn’t happen by accident, it’s built through deliberate choices around staff awareness, curriculum representation and student voice. His ‘journey’ within this work, reminded me how small, consistent actions across a year can shift culture, confidence and connection. I think that Yassar’s story offered a practical challenge for all of us: What would it look like to map our own DEIB journey across a year (staff learning, curriculum audits, student voice, community engagement) and treat it as a cycle of listening, acting and refining? For me, his contribution offered #EYP2CtW26 delegates (and me) us a template for intentional, sustainable progress, a next step be it short, medium or long term.

Next, it was a privilege to invite Monia Sahar Zahid and Claire Shooter – from HABS Elstree – who rather beautifully reminded us that belonging isn’t something you switch on in a crisis, it’s the product of the culture you’ve built long before tensions surface. Their emphasis on intellectual humility, visible inclusion and shared experiences offered a powerful blueprint for how schools can create the conditions for safety, trust and connection, even when global events hit the school gates, with a focus on the pastoral and safeguarding rather than the politics or teaching. I was struck by their noticing – their check-ins with staff and students, the human connections and deep rooted respect that revealed. I know several of the anecdotes shared, resonated powerfully with the 460+ educators accessing the session live – and the sense of thanks and gratitude for highlighting those moments was palpable in the chat forum spaces. My takeaway was need to reflect on our own readiness: Do we have the frameworks, shared language and staff confidence to hold difficult conversations before they arrive at our door? The SAFE framework they shared with us and emphasis on defensible decision‑making offer practical starting points for schools wanting to strengthen their approach to belonging, identity and conflict‑sensitive practice. So this was great to share.

Last but not least we were pleased to host Azuraye Williams from the Transform Trust, her contribution brought us back to something deceptively simple but deeply important: belonging starts with people, not paperwork. Her trust‑wide work showed how culture, connection and relationships must come before policies if we want DEIB to be lived rather than laminated, a reminder that systems only shift when humans do. Colleagues were taken with the meaningful and purposeful work undertaken to engage governors, but for me Azuraye left us a practical challenge: How well do we really know the belonging story of our own school? Her trust‑wide approach (surveying every child, engaging DEIB leads, and focusing on each school’s unique context) offered a clear starting point for any setting wanting to move from intention to impact.

It was that intentionality across the session was noticeable and built upon Hannah’s introductory remarks and concluding framing of belonging as a human need. Each contribution built on the last: from GEMS Metropole’s DEEI journey, to navigating global conflict at HABS Elstree, to trust‑wide belonging work at Transform Trust, and throughout, the examples shared (curriculum audits, microaggressions training, belonging surveys, pupil‑led research, ‘people before policies’) reminding us that belonging is not a slogan. It is a practice. A culture. A way of showing up for one another in schools.

In a climate where DEIB work is sometimes misrepresented or politicised, today was a powerful reminder that this work is not about ideology. It is rights‑respecting, dignity‑affirming, and safeguarding‑aligned. It is about ensuring that every child (and every adult) feels safe, seen, valued and able to bring their whole self into a school community. Nothing more complicated, nothing more controversial than that – and yet, the work can feel lonely, induce anxiety and expose vulnerability. I am deeply grateful to Hannah, Yassar, Claire, Monia and Azuraye, for their time, expertise and generosity of sharing, and this thread and spirit continues across the rest of the week.

If you missed this year’s DEIB Showcase for #EYP2CtW26 you can catch up here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5Qv_qeF-NpWPGep25cYsrp0zuYDEPH9c  

I’m reminded again that when educators gather with honesty, courage and care, we don’t just learn, we widen our circle of belonging, and in doing so, we create the conditions for empowered young people to do the same.


AI Will Shape Education - But Who Gets to Shape AI?

Belonging Effect Favicon

Written by Belonging Effect

Belonging Effect is committed to shaping intention into impact and supporting people with their Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, & Belonging strategy and training needs.

Artificial intelligence is already changing education. From lesson planning and assessment tools to tutoring platforms and student support systems, AI is becoming embedded in how schools operate and how young people learn. The conversation is no longer about whether AI will influence education. It already does.

The real question is this: Who gets to shape the future of AI in education?

Because AI is not neutral. Every AI system reflects the decisions, assumptions, priorities, and perspectives of the people who build it. The data selected. The questions asked. The problems chosen to solve. The voices included – and excluded – from the room.

If we are not intentional, AI risks reinforcing the very inequities education is trying to disrupt. And that matters deeply for schools.

We have already seen examples of AI systems producing biased outcomes:

  • Recruitment algorithms favouring certain demographics
  • Writing detection tools disproportionately flagging multilingual learners
  • Facial recognition systems performing less accurately on darker skin tones
  • Predictive technologies reinforcing historical inequalities rather than challenging them

Bias in AI is often not malicious. But it can become invisible, automated, and scaled at a speed education systems have never seen before. That is why educators must be part of shaping AI strategy – not simply responding to it after decisions have already been made.

Teachers, school leaders, inclusion specialists, youth workers, parents, and community voices bring something essential to this conversation: human understanding. Educators understand context: they understand belonging; they understand lived experience; they understand the difference between efficiency and equity.

If AI strategy is shaped only by technologists and commercial interests, we risk creating systems that optimise for speed and standardisation over humanity and inclusion. 

But there is another possibility…

AI could become a powerful tool for accessibility, creativity, personalisation, and opportunity – if a broader and more diverse range of people are involved in shaping what responsible AI looks like in practice.

That means we need more diverse voices and thinkers involved: more perspectives; more challenge; more collaboration. We need people from different backgrounds, communities, cultures, identities, and professional experiences helping to shape the future of AI in education. Not because diversity is a “nice to have,” but because it is a safeguard against harm.

At The Belonging Effect, we believe belonging and equity must sit at the centre of conversations about innovation and technology. That is why we are inviting our network to get involved.

Over the coming months, we will be hosting a series of free webinars exploring AI, education, equity, and belonging. These sessions are designed to create accessible spaces for educators and leaders to learn, question, challenge, and contribute to the conversation – regardless of their starting point with AI.

We are also collaborating on a fully funded training programme with our partners at CVP Group for educators and professionals who want to deepen their understanding of AI, inclusive practice, and ethical leadership in this rapidly evolving space.

We are keen to amplify more diverse voices in this conversation as too often, discussions about AI are dominated by a narrow range of perspectives so we want to help change that. Therefore, we are actively looking to publish blogs, reflections, case studies, and opinion pieces from educators, practitioners, community leaders, and changemakers from diverse backgrounds who are thinking critically about AI, inclusion, belonging, and the future of education.

You do not need to be an AI expert. You do not need to work in technology. If you care about equity, representation, belonging, and the future young people are inheriting, your voice matters, because the future of AI in education should not be built for communities without them – it must be built with them.

This moment presents both a challenge and an opportunity as the decisions being made now will shape classrooms, opportunities, and experiences for years to come. We cannot afford for those decisions to be shaped by only a small group of voices. Disrupting bias in AI starts with diversifying who is involved in shaping strategy and that work belongs to all of us. 

The future of AI is being written right now. The question is whether education – and the communities most impacted by these technologies – will help write the story.

To join one of our free webinars, apply for the fully funded training programme, or contribute a blog to our growing community of voices, connect with The Belonging Effect today. Our monthly newsletter will be out on Wednesday.

Together, let’s ensure the future of AI in education is inclusive, ethical, and rooted in belonging.


Privacy Preference Center